Search This Blog

Saturday, April 29, 2023

Pontiac Hardtop Coupe Variations 1965

Pontiac styling probably reached its apex during most of the 1960s.   This post focuses on the 1965 model year redesign of 2-door hardtop coupes.

Pontiac's standard size models that year were Catalina, Star Chief, Bonneville, and Grand Prix.  Star Chiefs were only available as four-door sedans and four-door hardtop sedans: the other models included hardtop coupes.  Pontiac's Tempest compact line also had 2-door hardtops, but on a different body platform, so those cars are not treated here..

Gallery

1965 Pontiac Catalina 2+2 hardtop coupe - BaT auction photo
The 2+2 was a performance-enhanced model, so has a few special trim items such as the faux-louvers on the front fender: otherwise, it's typical Catalina 2-door hardtop.  Catalinas and Grand Prix's had a 121.0-inch (3073 mm) wheelbase.  The wheelbase of the Bonneville in the next image is 124.0-inches (3150 mm).

1965 Pontiac Bonneville hardtop coupe - car listed for sale
The Bonneville's extra length takes place abaft of the rear door cutline.  Compare the position of the wheel with the aft point of the rear side window.  Or the aft point of the roof with the wheel below.  The rear fender bulge and length on the Bonneville strike me as being too great, disturbing the proportions of an otherwise attractive design.

1965 Pontiac Grand Prix hardtop coupe - car listed for sale
Model year 1963 saw the appearance of the classic Pontiac Grand Prix.  Its backlight window was a concave, dished-in shape echoed by the aft edge of the wide C-pillar.  That combination was carried over for the 1965 redesign (which wasn't as nice as the '63 original).  One virtue is that the top seems "lighter" than the convex alternatives seen on the Catalina and Bonneville.

Now for a brief walkaround of the Catalina shown in the top image.




Sunday, April 23, 2023

Lucid Air Luxury Electric Car

New for the 2022 model year, the Lucid Air is interesting from a design standpoint.  That's because it is a luxury or perhaps semi-luxury car that needs to appear suitable for that price range.  And it has an electric power train, which imposes the problem of not needing a front air intake, a design feature most buyers are conditioned to expect to find.  Most important, the new brand's visual characteristics trademark needs to be established.  That's a tall order for a styling director

In Lucid's case, the stylist is Derek Jenkins, a man with a good deal of automobile experience plus training at the Art Center College of Design in Pasadena, California.

Images below are factory-sourced.

Gallery

The front features a strong horizontal sweep that's a variation on a current styling chiché.  It differs in that it's narrow.  I'm not sure about what appears to be a chin-level air intake: is it functional?  Note that its shape and color are echoed along the bottom of the car's side.

Side sculpting is typical of current cars.  The car's profile is interesting due to the long, low, six-window passenger compartment greenhouse. Also the short "hood."  What we see is something like 1990s Chrysler Corporation "cab forward" proportions.


Unlike many current cars with two-tone paint schemes, that of the Lucid Air works well.  In fact, I find it a rare instance where two-toning looks better than single-tone paint.

This light-colored car shows off cut lines as well as the flowing dark areas noted earlier.  The flow is repeated at the rear of the car.  This is clever and unique -- especially the flow transitions by the wheel wells.

Front end cut lines.

Overhead view.  Hood sculpting adds interest, and vaguely reminds me of hood sculpting on pre-1960 Vauxhalls.

The greenhouse is low compared to the lower body height, furthering a racy appearance.  That low height reduces potential visual bulk for that lengthy feature.  I include this image because I recently saw a similar Lucid Air while driving, thus inspiring this post.

So did Jenkins succeed?  Yes, the car strikes me as looking fairly luxurious, thanks to the low greenhouse.  There is enough going on at the front that the lack of a grille isn't too obvious.  The brand identification matter is more difficult to evaluate.  In part, that's because it would be necessary to view follow-on designs to find out which features were carried over (keep in mind that Lucid could easily become a market failure).  The horizontal sweeps for the front and rear head- and tail-light assemblies are too cliché-like to serve that purpose.  The interesting flowing details along the lower edges of the car have potential, but their location makes them easy to ignore when casually viewed.  The low, six-window greenhouse with two-toning has the most potential, but also might not be enough.  A distinctive grille design would help the most, but that's not likely to happen.